The sheer amount of options available can easily cause overwhelm when selecting a comb. Tangle Teezer and Janeke are two well-known brands that frequently come up; both are renowned for producing high-quality goods. But do they really justify the additional expense?
Many people ponder whether purchasing these combs is really necessary given the abundance of less expensive options available. Are the less expensive options able to deliver the same outcomes, or is there a discernible performance difference?
To assist you in making an informed decision, we’ll examine Janeke, Tangle Teezer, and their rivals in more detail in this post. We’ll compare features, costs, and overall value.
When deciding between more expensive combs like Tangle Teezer and Janeke and their less expensive counterparts, it’s important to think about whether the higher cost actually yields superior results. This post will explain the main variations in terms of quality, performance, and longevity to assist you in determining whether spending a little more is worthwhile or whether a more affordable choice can provide equivalent advantages.
Janeke Superbrush
A brief overview of history
The brand’s history started in Italy in the far-off year of 1830.
Giorgio Janeke founded the business. Giorgio brought machinery and supplies for making hair combs with him when he relocated to Italy from Germany. Hair accessories were then limited to natural materials. Not even a century later, the business started making plastic combs. In addition to hair accessories, the production also featured mirrors, shaving, and manicure accessories. It was not until 2014 that Janeke Superbrush, the company’s innovative product, was developed by the descendant of the founder, who goes by his full name.
Giorgio Janeke, Jr. is currently serving as the company’s president.
An image from the renowned comb’s creation:
The comb Superbrush has the following primary benefits:
- ergonomic design
- lightweight design
- holes, the so-called "honeycomb", providing a blowing effect
- a special ratio of materials that provides a 100 percent antistatic effect.
Examine and contrast
Naturally, one of the most noticeable distinctions is the price of the combs. I have only seen analogs—copies that don’t have a logo—rather than replicas, which are exact copies of the original. An analog typically costs between 200 and 300 rubles in online retailers. The initial price ranges from 800 rubles to more, based on the retailer, special offers, etc.
The original version comes in a branded box with information about the comb in multiple languages, including Italian. There’s a sticker on the box with more information in Russian. I was happy to see that the comb needs to be washed once a week, according to the information on the sticker in Russian. It turns out that not everyone is aware of it. Typically, the analog comes in a plain package for sale.
Several benefits are listed by the manufacturer on the packaging:
- Patented "honeycomb" structure, allowing you to dry your hair quickly and safely
- Gentle and safe untangling, thanks to special teeth
- Ideal for distributing care products over wet hair
- Suitable for delicate children"s hair.
In my own words, I would like to point out that the Janeke combs have an incredibly vibrant color scheme that suits every preference.
The small version, which is what I own, was just put on sale. The shape of the original version, along with the quantity of teeth and "honeycombs," is exactly replicated in the smaller version. I possess the full-size version of the analog. Nevertheless, since their forms and ergonomics are the same, I will continue to compare them. I would like to point out that the mini version does not appear to have any analogs. This is what I believe happened when Superbrush small went on sale not too long ago.
The logo that was affixed to the original comb’s handle is what initially draws your attention.
"Mod brevettato" is written on the back of the original version. This indicates that a patent is on the product.
The combs appear to be the same at first glance.
The teeth differ in ways that are visible. The original is marginally narrower than its main portion and has a glossy tip. Matte makes up the majority of it. The analogue’s tooth is entirely matte, and the width of the tip and main body are the same. The original has slightly harder teeth than the copy, but this does not make the combing process any less effective. The copy is more soft than the original.
A circle is clearly visible in the center on the back surface of the original version. Such a circle does not exist in the analog.
In the "honeycombs," the distinction is clear. First of all, the holes’ actual location is a little bit different. Second, the original "honeycombs" are shaped differently; the corners are smoother.
As soon as I got the copy comb, I became aware of one subtlety. The comb is divided into two sections rather than being one piece. These sections are separated by a void. I mistook it for an analogue feature. To my surprise, there’s a similar gap in the original.
In my opinion, there was little difference between using the original and the analog. They both comb with equal care. The drying and styling process is unaffected by the honeycomb’s shape. Furthermore, I have never experienced a static effect from the analog, which Janeke claims is a special feature of the comb. That is, because of the materials used in its construction, the copy also has an antistatic effect.
Tangle Teezer The Wet Detangler
A brief overview of history
In contrast to Janeke, Tangle Teezer’s official history started in the UK in 2007. Sean Palfrey, a British stylist, is the master of development. Sean has thirty years of experience as a professional colorist.
In 2003, Sean had the notion to create after seeing firsthand how his clients lost hair when using conventional combs. There was no success in finding the ideal tool for extremely tangled hair. The stylist made the decision to make this tool. His goal was to create a hair detangling product that was gentle. Sean presented his invention on a British TV show to garner investment, and that was just four years later. Investors found the comb’s design to be completely odd and unattractive, so they did not like the idea.
Nevertheless, Sean was successful and made his creation available to the general public. Tangle Teezer combs gained popularity over time, and now members of the royal family—Kate Middleton among them—use them.
Examine and contrast
As opposed to Janeke Tangle Teezer, which comes in a plastic box. The British flag proudly displays its full size, giving away its country of origin.
Analogs are priced starting at 200 rubles. authentic worth 1300 rubles. The cost of Tangle Teezer combs has increased dramatically recently. I used some easy tricks to get it with a 1000 ruble discount.
The primary benefits of the Tangle Teezer combs are their unique two-level tooth structure and, similar to Janeke, a unique material combination that produces an antistatic effect. Using the Wet Detangler to massage and distribute hair care products on damp hair is a great idea.
Tangle Teezer also catered to their Russian-speaking users, providing additional information on a sticker and indicating information in Russian. It is also stated on the box that using a hair dryer with this comb is not recommended.
At first glance, the combs appear to be identical in general. The brand name Tangle Teezer is embossed on the back of the original item. There’s a difference in the original’s soft touch coating—it’smoreuniform and delicate to the touch.
I felt that there was a weight difference between the combs after handling both versions. I weighed them because I wasn’t that lazy. Indeed, the original was a little bit more difficult.
Additionally, the shape of the teeth differs. The teeth from the beginning are thinner. The general location and quantity are the same (+-).
There are subtle variations in clover heads. They are more convex and rounded in the original. Additionally, it seemed to me that the teeth’s analogue is shorter. Then I was saved by a centimeter ribbon. Yes, there is a difference—but only by a mere 1 mm. The copy falls short of the original. 18 mm and 17 mm, in that order.
I didn’t feel anything in general when I calculated using both versions of a specific difference. Tangle Teezer, the only Janeke A tad more robust in your copy. We haven’t discussed this before, so I connect it to novelty. The original handles this, but the analogue unravels the hair with insufficient care. Both versions have the same antistatic effect.
Using analogs is first and foremost an experience for me. A sample, if you will. I was able to test the combs after I received them, though at a discounted cost. Will they be liked by me? What will happen to the comb when it dries? Is it going to be cozy? And so forth. Upon realizing that I enjoyed both choices and that they were appropriate in every way, I came to the conclusion that the originals were unquestionably worth the money.
| Features | Janeke | Tangle Teezer | Analogues |
| Material quality | High-quality plastic, durable | Soft, flexible bristles | Varies, often cheaper plastics |
| Price range | Higher, premium brand | Mid-range, affordable | Lower, budget-friendly |
| Comfort in use | Ergonomic handle, easy grip | Compact, fits well in hand | Not always comfortable, depends on design |
| Effectiveness | Detangles with minimal pulling | Gentle on hair, effective detangling | Can tug or break hair, less effective |
| Design variety | Wide range of styles | Bright, playful designs | Limited, simpler options |
Choosing between Tangle Teezer, Janeke, and their less expensive counterparts reveals that each brand has advantages of its own. Tangle Teezer is distinguished by its distinctive bristle design and comfort, whereas Janeke is renowned for its premium feel and robustness.
While less expensive alternatives might work, they frequently don’t have the same durability and quality. For longer-lasting results and healthier hair, it may ultimately be worthwhile to spend a little bit extra on a reputable brand.
The ideal comb ultimately depends on your needs and financial situation. There is a choice for everyone, regardless of your preference for high-quality materials or something simple and practical.
